Political Science - Interest Groups and Inequality Politics
Political Science – Home
INTEREST GROUPS AND INEQUALITY POLITICS
OBJECTIONS TO INTEREST GROUPS
- Despite all these seemingly democratic things, perhaps it is not exactly the case
- Strong upper class ‘accent’
- Representational inequalities
- Not all segments of society are equally represented by interest groups to the same extent
- Lobbying game dominated by business interests
- Decline in organized labor becomes more apparent
- Even more social-based interest groups rely mostly on higher-income donors, therefore supporting their issues (ex. quality of life issues) rather than other issues (ex. poverty issues)
- Civil rights, gay marriage. etc.
RESOURCE INEQUALITIES
- Interest groups require money
- Therefore, the groups that represent the most wealthy have the largest amount of power
- Business groups and drug companies have huge networks of lobbyists
- Political Action Committees (PACs) and Super PACs
- Groups that are created to raise money for candidates
- Lead all the other groups in terms of sheer spending
- Super PACs are groups that don’t have to disclose financial information as long as they aren’t directly tied with a candidate
- Groups that are created to raise money for candidates
GRAPH: Amount of money that interest groups spend per year
- It is dominated by Finance/ Insurance/ Real Estate and other miscellaneous businesses category
ACCESS INEQUALITY
- Iron Triangle
- Alliance between an interest group, congressional committee and bureaucratic agencies (This has been used before; they work/act together to support a specific government program; it is very hard to break into this triangle)
- Issue Network
- Public and Private coalitions with experts and officials that exists around an issue and is publicly visible. (This is used now; Instead of three networks, there are huge amount of groups that work/act together to create an open, liquid interaction that is very hard to track, and very hard to understand as to who hold power)
- Move from a closed network to a more open and liquid one
- Makes policy-making predictable
- Hard to break in this system
- Move from a closed network to a more open and liquid one
- Public and Private coalitions with experts and officials that exists around an issue and is publicly visible. (This is used now; Instead of three networks, there are huge amount of groups that work/act together to create an open, liquid interaction that is very hard to track, and very hard to understand as to who hold power)
GRAPH: The Iron Triangle
GRAPH: Issue Network
PRIVILEGED PLACE OF BUSINESS CORPORATIONS
- Do Corporations undermine Democracy?
- Do they have too much influence?
- They have huge amounts of influence and lobbyists
- High regard for business in American society
- Fundamental capitalist society
- Politicians can’t be seen to be anti-business
- Tied closely with economy and health of American people
- Corporations are most powerful in good economic times, and when they build alliances among themselves
FACTION IN INTEREST GROUPS
- The Mischief of Faction
- Problem of Faction originated in Federalist 10
- Using disclosure as a tool against factions
- Registering lobbyists so you know who they are and what they are doing
- Revolving door
- Ex-politicians becoming lobbyists for things they once supported officially
- Some restrictions and ‘waiting periods’
- More efforts to reign this in but it creates loopholes
- Creation of PACs as a loophole in the Tax Code
- Corruption by Jack Abranoff lead to a call for more reform
GRAPH: THE REVOLVING DOOR
- 43% of those who leave Congress become lobbyists
- 42% of the House become lobbyists
- 50% of the Senate become lobbyists