iWriteGigs

Fresh Grad Lands Job as Real Estate Agent With Help from Professional Writers

People go to websites to get the information they desperately need.  They could be looking for an answer to a nagging question.  They might be looking for help in completing an important task.  For recent graduates, they might be looking for ways on how to prepare a comprehensive resume that can capture the attention of the hiring manager

Manush is a recent graduate from a prestigious university in California who is looking for a job opportunity as a real estate agent.  While he already has samples provided by his friends, he still feels something lacking in his resume.  Specifically, the he believes that his professional objective statement lacks focus and clarity. 

Thus, he sought our assistance in improving editing and proofreading his resume. 

In revising his resume, iwritegigs highlighted his soft skills such as his communication skills, ability to negotiate, patience and tactfulness.  In the professional experience part, our team added some skills that are aligned with the position he is applying for.

When he was chosen for the real estate agent position, he sent us this thank you note:

“Kudos to the team for a job well done.  I am sincerely appreciative of the time and effort you gave on my resume.  You did not only help me land the job I had always been dreaming of but you also made me realize how important adding those specific keywords to my resume!  Cheers!

Manush’s story shows the importance of using powerful keywords to his resume in landing the job he wanted.

Quiz on torts

Navigation   » List of Schools  »  California State University, Northridge  »  Business Law  »  Business Law 280 – Business Law I  »  Spring 2022  »  Quiz on torts

Need help with your exam preparation?

Below are the questions for the exam with the choices of answers:

Question #3
A  Doris would not be liable if Phil could have escaped by traveling two miles through a narrow, filthy, rat-infested sewer line that periodically floods with water.
B  According to some courts, Doris would escape liability if Phil slept through the entire period that the door was locked and thus was unaware that he was being detained.
C  Even if Phil could easily have escaped through an open window, Doris still is liable.
D  Doris would escape liability if she let Phil out of the room after one hour.
Question #4
A  Yes, because Jack could reasonably foresee that he could have severe pain any time and may cause an accident.
B  No, because she should have sued the driver of the passing car which hit them.
C  No, because Jack didn’t foresee that he would have that pain while driving and cause an accident.
D  Yes, because Jack caused the accident.
Question #5
A  No, because she cannot interfere with Jose’s activities on his property.
B  No, because Jose has not trespassed on Ann’s property.
C  No, because the generator is not on her property.
D  Yes, if the noise is a substantial and unreasonable interference with plaintiff’s use and enjoyment of land.
Question #6
A  All of these
B  Intent is an element of both torts.
C  Assault requires apprehension of an imminent battery.
D  Battery requires a harmful or offensive touching.
Question #7
A  Using Madonna’s name to sell women’s apparel.
B  Using basketball star Charles Barkley’s picture to sell beer.
C  Using a picture of a famous and recognizable race car driven by a famous race car driver to sell chewing tobacco.
D  Using the work of an unknown artist to illustrate the T-shirts one makes and sells.
Question #8
A  BU is not the publisher of the book.
B  BU did not violate any criminal law or regulation in selling the book.
C  BU did not want to harm the plaintiff.
D  BU is not the distributor of the book.
Question #9
A  Andrea will win because Josie’s statement injured Andrea’s reputation.
B  Andrea will win because Josie did not have absolute proof that Andrea had stolen money.
C  Josie will win because she had a conditional privilege to make that statement.
D  Josie will win because she had an absolute privilege to comment on a former employee’s performance.