iWriteGigs

Fresh Grad Lands Job as Real Estate Agent With Help from Professional Writers

People go to websites to get the information they desperately need.  They could be looking for an answer to a nagging question.  They might be looking for help in completing an important task.  For recent graduates, they might be looking for ways on how to prepare a comprehensive resume that can capture the attention of the hiring manager

Manush is a recent graduate from a prestigious university in California who is looking for a job opportunity as a real estate agent.  While he already has samples provided by his friends, he still feels something lacking in his resume.  Specifically, the he believes that his professional objective statement lacks focus and clarity. 

Thus, he sought our assistance in improving editing and proofreading his resume. 

In revising his resume, iwritegigs highlighted his soft skills such as his communication skills, ability to negotiate, patience and tactfulness.  In the professional experience part, our team added some skills that are aligned with the position he is applying for.

When he was chosen for the real estate agent position, he sent us this thank you note:

“Kudos to the team for a job well done.  I am sincerely appreciative of the time and effort you gave on my resume.  You did not only help me land the job I had always been dreaming of but you also made me realize how important adding those specific keywords to my resume!  Cheers!

Manush’s story shows the importance of using powerful keywords to his resume in landing the job he wanted.

Read the source paragraph below, and then decide which of the two multiple-choice paragraphs that follow is correct. (Click on the correct paraphrase.) The source (from page 57 of Peter Farber’s book Word Play): Most speakers unconsciously duel even during seemingly casual conversations, as can often be observed at social gatherings where they show less concern for exchanging information with other guests than for asserting their own dominance. Their verbal dueling often employs very subtle weapons like mumbling, a hostile act which defeats the listener’s desire to understand what the speaker claims he is trying to say (but is really not saying because he is mumbling!). Or the verbal dueler may keep talking after someone has passed out of hearing range, which is often an aggressive challenge to the listener to return and acknowledge the dominance of the speaker.

Question
Read the source paragraph below, and then decide which of the two multiple-choice paragraphs that follow is correct. (Click on the correct paraphrase.)
The source (from page 57 of Peter Farber’s book Word Play):

Most speakers unconsciously duel even during seemingly casual conversations, as can often be observed at social gatherings where they show less concern for exchanging information with other guests than for asserting their own dominance. Their verbal dueling often employs very subtle weapons like mumbling, a hostile act which defeats the listener’s desire to understand what the speaker claims he is trying to say (but is really not saying because he is mumbling!). Or the verbal dueler may keep talking after someone has passed out of hearing range, which is often an aggressive challenge to the listener to return and acknowledge the dominance of the speaker.

A  According to Peter Farber, people at parties and other social events often “unconsciously duel” in conversations in order to assert “dominance” over others. For example, a speaker may mumble, thus preventing a listener from understanding what is said. Or he or she may continue talking after the listener has moved away, a “challenge to the listener to return and acknowledge the dominance of the speaker” (Farber 57).
B  Peter Farber states that in social gatherings people often compete unconsciously to assert their own dominance. Sometimes they use subtle techniques like “mumbling,” to force listeners to work hard to hear what the speaker is saying. Or they talk even after a potential listener has passed out of hearing range, an aggressive attempt at forcing the listener to return and acknowledge the superiority of the speaker (Farber 57).
This question is taken from English 1A – Reading and Composition » Spring 2022 » Quiz 7 Paraphrasing Sources

Need help with your exam preparation?