Week 5 Knowledge Check

A  It is clear that the developers met face-to-face while developing the guideline and had candid discussion of the issues the guideline will address.

B  Findings with high correlations with patient characteristics were weighted heavily

C  It is clear that the developers attempted to conduct a systematic review for each important issue the guideline will address and used that evidence to formulate recommendations

D  Only recommendations that were supported by a majority of the development team were included in the final guideline

A  If the recommendations are clear, specific, and citations are provided, your project team should have confidence in them.

B  If the authors indicate that a consensus conference was held to produce the guideline, your project team should have confidence in them.

C  If the recommendations resonate with the views of those in your agency, your project team should have confidence in them.

D  The guidelines should be judged as having questionable credibility unless the producer provides access to another document or resource regarding the production process

A  The likelihood that implementation of the recommendation will produce good patient outcomes

B  The credentials of the association that produced it

C  The soundness of the methodology that produced the recommendation

D  How the recommendation will be received by clinicians

A  The linkage between the recommendation and the evidence supporting it

B  Its specificity

C  Its generalizability

D  The importance of the issue to patients

A  Determining if the panel producing the guideline had the expertise to do so

B  Determining if the recommendations are applicable to the patient population and setting in which you are considering using it

C  Determining if the guideline was produced using a sound process

D  Determining if the guideline is needed by clinicians

A  The p value

B  The size of the difference in the outcomes of the treatment groups

C  The research design

D  The profile of the sample

A  A healthcare librarian

B  Structured appraisal questions appropriate to the type of evidence

C  A statistical calculator

D  Online opinions regarding the study

A  A credible and clinically significant finding of a study can be used as a basis for care after deliberation about its applicability

B  A study produced by a reputable organization can with confidence be used as a basis for care.

C  A finding produced by a study done in a setting similar to the one in which the findings may be used can be used as a basis for care with confidence

D  A credible and clinically significant finding can with confidence be used as a basis for care.

A  The credibility of a finding mainly rests on the funding source and the credentials of the researchers.

B  The credibility of a finding mainly rests on whether the result is statistically significant.

C  The credibility of a finding mainly rests on the methodological soundness of the study that produced it.

D  The credibility of a finding mainly rests on whether it has undergone peer review

A  Appraisal is a careful, personal judgment regarding the generalizability of the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, conclusions of systematic reviews, or study findings.

B  Appraisal is a critique of the weaknesses of a clinical practice guideline, systematic review, or study.

C  Appraisal is a set of judgments using an objective set of criteria regarding the credibility, clinical significance, and applicability of the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, conclusions of systematic reviews, or study findings.

D  Appraisal is the opinion of an expert in the field regarding the methodological soundness of a clinical practice guideline, systematic review, or study