iWriteGigs

Fresh Grad Lands Job as Real Estate Agent With Help from Professional Writers

People go to websites to get the information they desperately need.  They could be looking for an answer to a nagging question.  They might be looking for help in completing an important task.  For recent graduates, they might be looking for ways on how to prepare a comprehensive resume that can capture the attention of the hiring manager

Manush is a recent graduate from a prestigious university in California who is looking for a job opportunity as a real estate agent.  While he already has samples provided by his friends, he still feels something lacking in his resume.  Specifically, the he believes that his professional objective statement lacks focus and clarity. 

Thus, he sought our assistance in improving editing and proofreading his resume. 

In revising his resume, iwritegigs highlighted his soft skills such as his communication skills, ability to negotiate, patience and tactfulness.  In the professional experience part, our team added some skills that are aligned with the position he is applying for.

When he was chosen for the real estate agent position, he sent us this thank you note:

“Kudos to the team for a job well done.  I am sincerely appreciative of the time and effort you gave on my resume.  You did not only help me land the job I had always been dreaming of but you also made me realize how important adding those specific keywords to my resume!  Cheers!

Manush’s story shows the importance of using powerful keywords to his resume in landing the job he wanted.

Chapter 11 Job Discrimination

Navigation   » List of Schools  »  California State University, Northridge  »  Philosophy  »  Philosophy 305 – Business Ethics  »  Fall 2022  »  Chapter 11 Job Discrimination

Need help with your exam preparation?

Below are the questions for the exam with the choices of answers:

Question #2
A  Brown v. Board of Education upheld the principle of “separate but equal”
B  the Bakke case outlawed affirmative action across the board
C  in the 2004 Holtz case, the Supreme Court ruled that “race-conscious” admissions policies are unconstitutional
D  in the University of Michigan cases (Gratz and Grutter), the Supreme Court upheld moderate, flexible affirmative action programs
Question #3
A  believe women and men should be paid on the same scale both for doing equivalent jobs, and for doing different jobs involving equivalent skill, effort, and responsibility.
B  believe it is necessary for getting rid of sexual harassment.
C  base their doctrine on the free-market determination of wages.
D  simply want equal pay for the same job.
Question #5
A  sexual discrimination against young African-American men.
B  sexual discrimination against young white men.
C  racial discrimination against young African-American men.
D  racial discrimination against young white men.
Question #6
A  “Quid pro quo” and “hostile work environment.”
B  Male to male, female to female.
C  Boss to worker, worker to boss.
D  Male to female, female to male.
Question #7
A  There is little statistical evidence of job discrimination today.
B  Today, men are just as likely as women to be in so-called “pink collar” occupations.
C  African Americans have the third highest standard of living in the world.
D  Relatively few women and minorities have made it to the very top of their professions.
Question #8
A  Whenever underrepresentation of females or minorities is evident, firms are to try a little harder.
B  Firms should prepare an oral equal-employment policy and an affirmative action commitment.
C  Firms are expected to survey current female and minority employment by department and job classification.
D  Firms should appoint an administrative assistant to direct and implement their program and to publicize their policy and affirmative action commitment.
Question #10
A  equals.
B  high potentials.
C  assets.
D  playthings.
Question #12
A  upheld the legality of mandatory drug testing.
B  upheld the legality of hiring quotas.
C  treated sexual harassment as a form of discrimination.
D  upheld seniority over affirmative action.
Question #13
A  are too emotional to be good managers.
B  take negative feedback professionally rather than personally.
C  possess the necessary drive to succeed in business.
D  will not place family demands above work considerations.
Question #15
A  A male employer suggesting sexual offers to a female employee.
B  A manager enforcing a dress code for a work environment.
C  A female employee hugging a co-worker when he announces his engagement.
Question #17
A  considerations of sex are permissible as one factor in deciding whom to promote.
B  quotas based on considerations of race are unconstitutional.
C  racially segregated schooling is unconstitutional.
D  affirmative action is unconstitutional.
Question #18
A  Compensatory justice forbids affirmative action.
B  Blacks and whites are already equal in socioeconomic terms.
C  Affirmative action is the same thing as fixed numerical quotas.
D  Affirmative action violates the principle of equality.
Question #20
A  over 11,000
B  over 50,000
C  over 15,000
D  over 25,000
Question #24
A  It is necessary to break the cycle that keeps minorities and women locked into low-paying, low-prestige jobs.
B  It ignores the principle of equality.
C  It is a color-blind policy.
D  It evens the score with young white men, who have had it good for too long.
Question #25
A  Current federal law treats sexual harassment as a form of sexual discrimination.
B  According to current federal law, men cannot be victims of sexual harassment.
C  The Supreme Court has established a hard and fast line between permissible and impermissible affirmative action plans.